IVCVM | 1999

Metabolic Considerations for Treatment of Birds

Gerry M. Dorrestein

Department of Pathology, Veterinary Faculty, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Abstract: Allometric scaling or metabolic dosing is based on the principle that the amount of drug to be administered to animals is related more closely to daily energy use than to body weight. Using the formula BMR= K.W0.75 a table was calculated for the most common weight range of birds presented for treatment in a veterinary practice. Recalculating some pharmacokinetic studies from dose in mg/kg to mg/kcal, these dosage tables became species independent. Based on the calculated daily energy use of the animal, the amount of drug for that animal can easily be extrapolated.

Key Words: Allometric scaling, Antibiotics, Antimycotics, Antiparasiticals.

Introduction

Even with an increasing amount of pharmacokinetic data in birds, the use of extrapolated drug regimens will continue to be common practice for these species. The extrapolation, using "allometric scaling" from human, mammalian, and avian drugs to birds is complicated and has its limits. Most of the birds have a low bodyweight. This, combined with the knowledge that birds have high basal metabolic rates (BMR’s), makes an accurate dosage of therapeutics very important.

Methods

Most formularies for birds are based on information derived from studies in poultry, parrots, or pigeons. The advised individual dosages and drinking water concentrations can be considered to be based on an average bodyweight of 4-500 gram and a drinking water intake of 40-60 ml/kg bw for birds of again 500 grams.1,2 The average basal metabolic rate as expressed by the formula BMR (kcal) = K.W 0.75) of the passerine bird (K=129) is 50 to 60 percent higher than those of non-passerines (K=78) of the same body size.3,4 This knowledge should be used to calculate a dosage regimen and, using this system, the dosages will be expressed in mg/kcal.

Results

For a quick reference, the conversion of body weight (gram) to basal metabolism (kcal/day) is presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Conversion of body-weight (gram) to BASAL metablism (kcal) for passerines (Pass) and non-passerines (N-pass).
Bw (g) Pass N-pass Bw (g) Pass N-pass Bw (g) Pass N-pass
10 4 2 155 32 19 480 74 45
11 4 3 160 33 20 490 76 46
12 5 3 165 33 20 500 77 46
13 5 3 170 34 21 520 79 48
14 5 3 175 35 21 540 81 49
15 6 3 180 36 22 560 84 50
16 6 4 185 36 22 580 86 52
17 6 4 190 37 22 600 88 53
18 6 4 195 38 23 620 90 54
19 7 4 200 39 23 640 92 56
20 7 4 210 40 24 660 94 57
25 8 5 220 41 25 680 97 58
30 9 6 230 43 26 700 99 60
35 10 6 240 44 27 720 101 61
40 12 7 250 46 28 740 103 62
45 13 8 260 47 28 760 105 63
50 14 8 270 48 29 780 107 65
55 15 9 280 50 30 800 109 66
60 16 9 290 51 31 820 111 67
65 17 10 300 52 32 840 113 68
70 18 11 310 54 32 860 115 70
75 18 11 320 55 33 880 117 71
80 19 12 330 56 34 900 119 72
85 20 12 340 57 35 920 121 73
90 21 13 350 59 35 940 123 74
95 22 13 360 60 36 960 125 76
100 23 14 370 61 37 980 127 77
105 24 14 380 62 38 1000 129 78
110 25 15 390 64 38 1020 131 79
115 25 15 400 65 39 1040 133 80
120 26 16 410 66 40 1060 135 81
125 27 16 420 67 41 1080 137 83
130 28 17 430 69 41 1100 139 84
135 29 17 440 70 42 1120 140 85
140 30 18 450 71 43 1140 142 86
145 30 18 460 72 44 1160 144 87
150 31 19 470 73 44 1180 146 88

The calculation of the concentration for drinking water medication should be based on the daily water intake. While some desert passerines, such as Zebra finches, have been known to survive for months without drinking water, most small passerine birds drink from 250 to 300 ml/kg body weight daily and may eat up to 30% of their body weight daily.<sup>5</sup> This is much more than the generally advised 40-60 ml/kg bw for larger parrots.<sup>1</sup> This amount is for an average parrot of 500 grams with a basal metabolism of 46 kcal/day about 0.5 ml/kcal/day. It may be wise to use this amount of total water intake as a starting point for the small birds. Using the dose in mg/kcal and a drinking water intake of 0.5 ml/kcal, the drug concentration per liter will be independent from the species and, therefore, the same for all birds (Tables 2 and 3). This is a good starting point when information from experimental work is not available. The daily water consumption, however, is very much influenced by environmental temperature, type of diet (e.g. fruits), and original habitat of the bird (desert). When using this information for calculating the drinking water concentration for the treatment of birds, the owner should always measure the actual intake and adjust the concentration to reach the desired average drug intake per kcal for the birds that are being treated.

Table 2. Conventional dosage regimens for antimicrobial drugs in pet birds (modified after Dorrestein 1993).
emp: based on empiry
kin: based on pharmacokinetic studies in the species indicated.
For the calculation of the metabolic dosage the following bodyweights when pharmacokenitic studies were available: pigeon 450 g and parrot 400g.
Conversion from mg/kg to mg/kcal = dose/(K.W0.75)
Routes Dose mg/kcal Dose mg/kg Interval (h) Study/species est. Bw Remarks
ANTIBIOTICS AND CHEMOTHERAPEUTICS
BETA-LACTAMS
cloxacillin IM 2.16 4.31 100 200 24 emp/birds 500
ampicillin-Na IM 3.50 150 12-24 kin/pigeon 450 gram-positives
ampicillin-trih. PO 0.58 25 12-24 kin/pigeon 450 gram-positives
PO 2.80 4.08 120 175 12-24 kin/pigeon/psit 450 gram-negatives
amoxycillin-Na IM 1.17 50 12-24 kin/pigeon 450 gram-positives
5.83 250 12-24 kin/pigeon 450 gram-negatives
amoxycillin-trih. PO 0.47 20 12-24 kin/pigeon 450 gram-positives
PO 2.55 4.46 100 175 12-24 emp/psitt 400 gram-negatives
AX. -"long-acting" IM 2.33 100 48 kin/pigeon 450 gram-positves
amoxycillin/clavulanic acid (1) IM 1.17 50 8-12 kin/doves/psitt 450 gram positives
PO 2.33 100 8-12 kin/doves/psitt 450 gram positives
IM 2.33 100 8-12 kin/doves/psitt 450 gram-negatives
PO 4.67 200 8-12 kin/doves/psitt 450 gram-negatives
PO 1.17 2.33 50 100 12 kin/doves/psitt 450 intestinal infections
carbenicillin IM 2.55 5.10 100 200 8-12 emp/psitt 400 synergistic aminoglycosides
IV 2.55 5.10 100 200 8-12 emp/psitt 400
IT 2.55 100 24 emp/psitt 400 Pseudomonas infections
ticarcillin IM,IV 3.82 5.10 150 200 2-4 kin/psitt 400 synergistic aminoglycosides
cefotaxime IM,IV 1.62 2.16 75 100 6-8 emp/birds 500
cefoxitin IM,IV 1.08 1.62 50 75 6-8 emp/birds 500
ceftrioxone IM,IV 1.62 2.16 75 100 4-6 emp/birds 500
ceftazidine IM,IV 1.62 2.16 75 100 6-8 emp/birds 500
ceftiofur IM 1.08 2.16 50 100 6 emp/birds 500
cephalothin IM,IV 2.16 100 2-6 kin/birds 500
cephalexin monhydr PO 1.08 2.16 50 100 8 emp/birds 500
0.16 0.23 35 50 2-6 kin/cranes,emus 4000
cephradine PO 0.75 1.08 35 50 6 emp/birds 500
piperacillin IM,IV 4.31 200 6-8 emp/birds 500 synergistic with
1.91 2.55 75 100 4-6 emp/psitt 400 aminoglycosides
POLYMYXINS
polymixin B PO 1078.07 50000 12 emp/birds 500
 
AMINOGLYCOSIDES
neomycin PO 0.22 10 24 emp/birds 500
streptomycin PO 0.64 1.28 50 100 24 emp/chicken 1000
PO 2.33 4.67 100 200 24 emp/pigeon 450
IM 0.22 0.65 10 30 8-12 emp/birds 500
kanamycin IM 0.22 0.43 10 20 12 emp/birds 500
gentamycin IM 0.05 0.22 3 10 6-12 kin/birds 500 nephrotoxicity
  PO   1.02   40 8-24 emp/psitt 400 intestinal tract inf
amikacin IM,IV 0.38 0.51 15 20 8-12 kin/psitt 400 nephrotoxicity
    0.51 1.02 20 40 12-24 emp/psitt 400  
tobramycine IM,IV 0.05 0.11 3 5 12 emp/birds 500  
 
LINCOSAMIDES, MACROLIDEN, AND PLEUROMUTILINS
spectinomycin IM,SC   0.58   25 8 emp/pigeon 450  
  PO   0.65   30 24 emp/birds 500  
  PO 1.92 3.21 150 250 24 emp/chicken 1000 flock treatment enteritis
lincomycin PO 0.82 1.17 35 50 12-24 emp/birds 450 overdose caused death
lincomycin/spect PO   1.08   50 24 emp/birds 500  
clindamycin PO   2.33   100 24 emp/pigeons 450  
erythromycin IM 0.23 0.47 10 20 24 emp/birds 450  
  PO 1.17 2.33 50 100 8-12 emp/psitt 450  
spiramycin IM   0.58   25 24 emp/pigeon 450  
  PO   1.08   50 24 emp/birds 500  
tylosin IM 0.22 0.86 10 40 6-8 kin/birds 500  
  PO   1.08   50 24 emp/birds 500  
tiamulin PO 0.54 1.08 25 50 24 emp/birds 500  
oleandomycin IM 0.00 0.58   25 24 emp/pigeon 450  
  PO 0.00 1.17   50 24 emp/pigeon 450  
 
CHLORAMPHENICOL
chloramph-succ. IM   2.33   100 6 kin/pigeon 450  
      1.27   50 8-12 kin/parrots 400
    1.08 1.72 50 80 12-24 kin/other 500  
chloramph.palm. PO 1.27 2.55 50 100 6-12 emp/psitt 400  
 
TETRACYCLINES
chlortetracyclin PO 0.93 1.17 40 50 8 kin/pigeon 450 grit
  PO         12 kin/pigeon 450 no grit
  Diet     0.25-1.0%   45 days kin/psitt 400  
oxytetracyclin IM,SC 0.32 1.08 15 50 12-24 emp/birds 500 tissue damage
OTC-"long-acting" IM,SC 1.27 2.55 50 100 48-72 kin/psitt 400  
tetracyclin PO   1.27   50 8 emp/psitt 400  
doxycyclin PO   0.58   25 12 kin/pigeon 450 grit
  PO   0.18   8 12 kin/pigeon 450 no grit
doxycyclin                  
(Vibramycin-IV) IM,SC 1.75 2.33 75 100 5-7 days kin/pigeon 450  
              kin/psitt 400  
 
SULFONAMIDES AND POTENTIATORS
trimethoprim PO 0.35 0.47 15 20 8 kin/pigeon 450  
T + sulfatroxazole PO 0.23 1.17 10 50 12 kin/pigeon 450  
T + sulfamethoxaz. PO 0.23 1.17 10 50 24 kin/pigeon 450  
 
FLUOROQUINOLINES
flumequine IM,PO   0.70   30 8-12 kin/pigeon 450 vomiting!
ciprofloxacin PO,IM 0.32 0.43 15 20 12 emp/birds 500  
enrofloxacin IM,SC 0.12 0.23 5 10 24 kin/pigeon 450  
  PO 0.23 0.47 10 20 12-24 kin/pigeon/psitt 450  
  Food 6.37 25.49 250 1000 24 kin/psitt 400  
 
MISCELLANEOUS ANTIMICROBIAL DRUGS
furazolidone PO 0.35 0.47 15 20 24 emp/pigeon 450  
furaltadone PO 0.35 0.47 15 20 24 emp/pigeon 450  
 
TUBERCULOSTATICA (in combination three or more drugsinitional therapy should include rifabutin, ethambutol, and ether azithromycin or clarithromycin)
isoniazid PO 0.11 0.32 5 15 12 emp/birds 500 GI- and CNS disorder
rifampin PO 0.22 0.43 10 20 12-24 emp/birds 500  
rifabutin PO 0.38 1.15 15 45 24 emp/psit 400  
ethambutal PO 0.32 0.65 15 30 12-24 emp/birds 500 for combination treatment
streptomycin PO 0.51 1.02 20 40 24 emp/psit 400  
amikacin IM 0.38 0.76 15 30 12-24 emp/psit 400  
ciprofloxacin/enrofloxacin PO 0.38 0.76 15 30 12-24 emp/psit 400  
clofazamine PO 0.15 0.31 6 12 24 emp/psit 400  
clarithromycin PO   1.83   85 24 suggested 500  
azithromycin PO   0.97   45 24 suggested 500  
 
ANTIMYCOTIC DRUGS
5-flurocytosine PO/Gavage 0.76 1.27 30 50 6-12 emp/psitt 400 icw amphtheracin B 14-28 d
amphoteracin B IV   0.03   2 8-12 emp/birds 500 5-7 days
amphoteracin B IT   0.02   1 8-12 emp/birds 500  
amphoteracin B PO   0.11   5 24   500  
caprillic acid PO   5.39   250 24 emp/birds 500  
chlorhexidine PO 0.11 0.22 5 10 24 emp/birds 500 toxic for finches
enilconazole aerosol     -   - -   only disinfection equipment
fluconazole PO 0.04 0.11 2 5 24 emp/birds 500 7-10 days
griseofulvine PO   0.26   20 24   1000 4-6 weeks, dermatomycosis
itraconazole PO 0.13 0.25 5 10 12-24 kin/psitt/birds 400 14 days, in orange juice or 0.1N HCl
ketoconazole PO 0.51 0.76 20 30 12 kin/birds 400 14-30 days ?liver damage?
miconazole IM,IV 0.22 0.43 10 20 8-24 emp/birds 500 candida or cryptococcus inf.
nystatin PO 2548.94 7646.83 100000 300000 8-12 emp/psitt 400 7-10 days
ronidazol PO 0.4     31.2       against flagellates
toltrazuril PO 0.09     7.02       coccidiostat
 
MISCELLANEOUS DRUGS
deferoxamine IM   1.28   100 24   1000 Iron chelator used in toucans
insuline IM 0.006 0.013 0.5 1.0 24   1000  
 
ANTIPARASITICA commonly used by the author
chloroquine PO 0.216 0.539 10 25 24   500 bloodparasites, see spec protocol
clazuril PO 0.108 0.216 5 10 24   500 coccidiostatic
dimetridazole PO   0.065   3 24   500 against flagellates
fenbendazole PO   0.032   2 24   500 anthelmintic
ivermectin IM/PO   0.004   0.2 6 wks   500 anthelmintic
levamisole PO   0.043   2 24   500 anthelmintic
metronidazole PO   0.108   5 24   500 against flagellates
oxfenbendazole PO   0.862   40 24   500 anthelmintic
praziquantel PO 0.270 0.539 13 25 24   500 anthelmintic (trematodes and cestodes)
pyrmethamine PO 0.011 0.022 1 2 24   500 bloodparasites, see spec protocol
ronidazol PO   0.323   15 24   500 against flagellates
toltrazuril PO   0.090   7 24   1000 coccidiostatic

Discussion

Even though there are many complicating factors in dosing birds, not at least because of the many different species that are can be offered for treatment, this method based on metabolism seems more adequate than only dosing on body weight.6 This method was initially propagated for use in exotic animals in 1990;7 however, it has never become common practice in exotic animal medicine. The main reason for not using this technique may be due to the "complicated" calculations and worksheets that were used for transforming mg/kg to mg/kcal. In reptiles, Sedgwick started to use the term "MEC/SMEC-dose. "8 This is freely translated as the dose in mg/kcal. By using the Hainsworth constants (K) for the 5 "metabolic taxa" ( Passerine birds 129; Non-passerine birds 78; Placental mammals 70; Marsupial mammals 49, and Reptiles 10), a table can be calculated for the most common weight ranges, e.g. , Tables 1 and 3. The calculated doses in mg/kcal are species independent. By reading the "closest" energy use (kcal) for a given animal, the dose can easily be calculated (see Table 3). In the future, all pharmacokinetic studies should calculate the dose in mg/kcal (MEC/SMEC-dose). These doses could be used for any given species.

Table 3. Oral dosage regimens for chemotherapeutics, antibiotics, and some other drugs commonly used in pet birds based on the dosage in mg/kcal (BMR=K.W0.75) and a water intake of 0.5 mg/kcal. The calculated water concentration preferably should be divided between water and food.
Drug Metabolic dose Calculated water conc BW Passerine Non-pass
K=129 K=78
mg/kcal mg/l gram kcal/day kcal/day
Amoxycillin (low level) 0,47 940 10 4 2
Amoxycillin (high level) 2,55 5.100 20 7 4
Amoxycillin/clav. Acid (1) 4,31 8.620 30 9 6
Ampicillin (low level) 0,58 1.160 40 12 7
Ampicillin (high level) 2,80 5.600 50 14 8
Chloroquine 0,22 431
Chlortetracycline (2) (low level) 0,93 1.860 60 16 9
Chlortetracycline (2) (high level) 1,17 2.340 70 18 11
Dimetridazole (3) 0,06 129 80 19 12
Doxycycline (2) with grit 0,58 1.160 90 21 13
Doxycycline (2) without grit 0,18 360 100 23 14
Enrofloxacin (4) 0,23 460
Erythromycin 1,17 2.340 150 31 19
Fenbendazole 0,03 50 200 39 23
Furazolidone 0,35 700 250 46 28
Ivermectin (3) 0,004 9 300 52 32
Levamisole 0,04 80 350 59 35
Lincomycin 0,82 1.633
Lincospectine 1,08 2.156 400 65 39
Ketoconazole 0,51 1.020 450 71 43
Metronidazole 0,11 216 500 77 46
Neomycin 0,22 440 550 82 50
Polymyxin (IU) 2.549 5.097.889 600 88 53
Nystatin (5) (IU) 1.078 2.156.145
Ronidazole 0,32 647 650 93 56
Spectinomycin 0,65 1.300 700 99 60
Spiramycin 1,08 2.156 750 104 63
Sulphachlor-pyrazin (3) 0,07 140 800 109 66
Sulphadimidine (3) 0,07 140 850 114 69
Toltrazuril 0,09 180 900 119 72
Trim/sulpha (6) 0,23 460 950 124 75
Tylosin 0,38 760 1000 129 78
(1) Calculated for amoxycillin part only,
(2) In case of ornithosis for 30 days,
(3) Metabolic dose estimated from drinking water concentration,
(4) In case of ornithosis for 21 days,
(5) For the treatment of Candida albicans for 3-6 weeks,
(6) This dosage is for the trimethoprim part alone.
Example calculation: Parrot 350 g. Enrofloxacin PO dose = 35 x 0.23 mg = 8 mg/day

References

1. Carpenter JW, Mashima TY, Rupiper DJ: Birds. In: Exotic Animal Formulary. Manhattan, Kansas, Greystone Publications, 1996

2. Dorrestein GM: Metabolism, Pharmacology, and Therapy. In: Altman RB, Clubb SL, Dorrestein GM, Quesenberry KE (eds): Avian Medicine and Surgery. Philadelphia, WB Saunders Company, 1997, p 661

3. Walsberg GE: Avian ecological energetics. Avian Biology 7:161, 1983

4. Gill FB: Ornithology. New York, Freeman and Company, 1994

5. Macwhirter P: 43. Passeriformes. In: Ritchie RW, Harrison GJ, Harrison LR (eds): Avian Medicine: Principles and Application, Lake Worth, Wingers Publishing, Inc, 1994, p 1172

6. Dorrestein GM: Antimicrobial drug use in pet birds. Chapter 26, In: Prescott JF, Baggot JD (eds): Antimicrobial Therapy in Veterinary Medicine,, 2nd Ed. Ames, Iowa State University Press, 1993, p 490

7. Sedgwick CJ, Pokras M, Kaufman G: Metabolic scaling: using estimated energy cost to extrapolate drug doses between different species and different individuals of diverse body size. Proc Annual Meeting AAZV, 1990, pp. 60-62.

8. Sedgwick CJ and Borkowski R: Allometric scaling: extrapolating treatment regimens for reptiles. In: Mader DR (ed) Reptile Medicine and Surgery. W.B. Saunders Company Philadelphia. 1996 pp. 235-241.

This Page Last Updated November 15, 1999

 

List of Papers | IVCVM Menu | Pathology Department | College of Veterinary Medicine | UGA

The content and opinions expressed on this Web page do not reflect the views of nor are they endorsed by the administration of the University of Georgia or the University System of Georgia.