Traumatic Reticuloperitonitis (Hardware Disease)
in Cattle
Andrea M. Cavedo,
DVM; Kenneth S. Latimer, DVM, PhD; Heather L. Tarpley, DVM; Perry
J. Bain, DVM, PhD
Class of 2004 (Cavedo) and Department of Pathology (Latimer, Tarpley,
Bain), College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens,
GA 30602-7388

Introduction
Traumatic reticuloperitonitis,
or TRP, is a relatively common disease in adult cattle caused by
the ingestion and migration
of a foreign body in the reticulum. Cattle are more likely to ingest
foreign bodies than small ruminants since they do not use their lips
for prehension and are more likely to eat a chopped feed.
The typical foreign body is a metallic object, such as a piece of wire
or a nail, often greater than 2.5 cm in length (Fig. 1). The majority
of affected cattle (87%) are dairy cattle and 93% are older than
2 years of age.1 It
has been hypothesized that dairy cattle are more commonly affected
than beef cattle since they are more likely to be fed a chopped feed,
such as silage or haylage. A large number of adult dairy cattle have
metallic foreign bodies in their reticulum without signs of clinical
disease. It is likely that a predisposing factor in otherwise normal
cows, such as tenesmus or a gravid uterus, causes migration of the
foreign body into the reticular wall (Fig. 2).1
 |
 |
| Figure
1. Metal door spring removed from a cows reticulum
(image courtesy of Noahs Arkive, University of Georgia). |
Figure
2. A nail is embedded in the mucosa of the reticulum
(image courtesy of Noahs Arkive, University of Georgia). |
The classic signs
associated with TRP are consistent with an acute, localized peritonitis
and include anorexia, fever, tachypnea, and an
arched stance with abducted elbows (indicating cranial abdominal pain)
(Fig. 3). If the foreign body has penetrated the diaphragm and pericardium,
affected cattle also can have muffled heart sounds, jugular pulses,
and brisket edema8 secondary to congestive heart failure
caused by pericarditis (Fig. 4). However, not all cattle develop acute
peritonitis; a significant population of affected cattle develops chronic
or subclinical TRP that
is not as easily diagnosed as acute TRP. Clinical signs associated
with chronic peritonitis include anorexia, unthriftiness, decreased
milk production, rumen hypomotility, and a change in manure consistency.
Laboratory tests can be helpful in distinguishing cases of chronic
TRP from other gastrointestinal diseases and are more accessible to
veterinarians than other diagnostic tests, such as survey radiology
or contrast radiography of the reticulum. The most appropriate laboratory
tests for diagnosing TRP are the complete blood count (CBC), serum
biochemical profile, and abdominocentesis.1
 |
 |
| Figure
3. A nail has penetrated the reticulum, causing traumatic
reticuloperitonitis (hardware disease) and the death of this
cow (image courtesy of Noahs Arkive, University of Georgia). |
Figure
4. A piece of wire has penetrated the reticulum and diaphragm
before lodging in the pericardium. Pericardial effusion and
fibrin deposition resulted from this traumatic injury (image
courtesy of Noahs Arkive, University of Georgia). |
Laboratory Testing
Complete
blood count The CBC in a cow with
TRP can vary depending on whether the peritonitis is acute or chronic
and localized or diffuse. In general, cattle with persistent purulent
inflammation have leukocyte counts ranging from 4,000-15,000/µL,
with neutrophilia. Although lymphocytes
are the predominant leukocyte circulating in healthy cattle, endogenous
corticosteroid release secondary to stress may cause lymphopenia by
cell redistribution; circulating lymphocytes do not re-enter the lymphatics
but become sequestered in lymphoid tissue and bone marrow.7
Some cattle with acute, localized peritonitis will have CBCs within
normal reference intervals, while others will have a degenerative left
shift (band neutrophils outnumbering segmented neutrophils). Cattle
with acute diffuse peritonitis will also have a degenerative left shift.
In chronic cases, a mature neutrophilia is common.1 Neutrophil
counts in these individuals are often greater than 4,000/µL.
Affected cattle also will show hyperfibrinogenemia, with fibrinogen
concentrations greater than 1,000 mg/dL.2 Fibrinogen is
an acute phase protein, and in cattle it may be the best indicator
of acute inflammation because fibrinogen concentrations often increase
prior to development
of neutrophilia.7
Hematology data can be used to detect inflammation, but generally
cannot identify a specific cause of inflammatory disease. Other tests
may be useful in differentiating between different inflammatory diseases,
such as TRP
Serum
biochemical profile The most
common chemistry abnormality associated with TRP is hyperproteinemia
with
a hyperglobulinemia. Some authors suggest that a total serum protein
concentration greater than 10 mg/dL is highly suggestive of TRP.2,5 In
one study of cattle suspected of having TRP that also had a total plasma
protein concentration of 100 g/L (10mg/dL) had an 83% chance of having
TRP, 83% of the cattle with a total plasma protein concentration
of 10 mg/dL had TRP.5
Other chemistry
abnormalities associated with TRP may include hypochloremia, hypokalemia,
and metabolic alkalosis; these abnormalities occur secondary
to ruminal hypomotility and/or vagal indigestion. Hypochloremic metabolic
alkalosis may occur due to sequestration of hydrochloric acid in
the rumen caused by rumen stasis or vagal indigestion. Hypokalemia
is caused primarily by anorexia, but may be potentiated slightly by
ion exchange caused by the alkalosis and/or abomasal reflux into the
rumen. With alkalosis, intracellular H+ ions can be exchanged for extracellular K+ ions,
decreasing serum potassium concentrations. This effect is minor compared
to the K+ ion shifts associated with acidosis.7
Abdominocentesis Normal
peritoneal fluid of an adult cow is straw-colored, clear, and odorless.
Protein and fibrinogen concentrations can vary from 1.0-3.0 g/dL and
100-500 g/dL, respectively. The nucleated cell count should be less
than 10,000 cells/µL. The majority of nucleated cells are non-degenerate
neutrophils and mononuclear cells. At least 10% of the nucleated cell
population should consist of eosinophils.3 Turbid samples
or samples containing gross pus or fibrin are indicative of peritonitis,
at least locally. It is, however, normal for bovine peritoneal fluid
to clot upon standing. Nucleated cell count, cell percentages, and
character of cells present can be suggestive of disease. If a sample
contains immature, degenerative (Fig. 5), or toxic neutrophils (especially
if the NCC is greater than 10,000 cells), purulent peritonitis is present.
Purulent peritonitis is indicated by an abdominal fluid sample with
greater than 40% neutrophils. The presence of intracellular bacteria
and/or degenerate neutrophils indicates septic peritonitis.3
 |
| Figure
5. Two degenerative neutrophils with phagocytosed
bacteria in abdominocentesis fluid from a cow with traumatic
reticuloperitonitis (hardware disease). Bacteria also are scattered
in the background of the smear (Wright stain). |
Normal cytologic
findings do not exclude TRP since cattle tend to wall off inflammation
in the peritoneal cavity, making it more difficult to diagnose local
peritonitis. Abdominocentesis for evaluation of TRP
should be performed at the ruminal-reticular recess to increase the
chance of obtaining a diagnostic sample.3 The reference
ranges for calves vary significantly from adult cattle. The most notable
difference between normal peritoneal samples in calves versus adult
cattle is the protein concentration and percentages of neutrophils
and eosinophils. Adult ranges should not be used to evaluate peritoneal
fluid obtained from younger animals.6
Differential Diagnoses
TRP must be distinguished
from other causes of peritonitis or abdominal pain for a definitive
diagnosis. In febrile animals, the most likely differential diagnosis
is a perforating abomasal ulcer. A perforating abomasal ulcer can
be distinguished from
chronic TRP since a cow with chronic TRP is typically afebrile and
has cranial ventral abdominal pain, whereas a cow with a perforating
abomasal ulcer typically has mid-abdominal pain.1 Also,
cattle with a perforating abomasal ulcer may show evidence of gastrointestinal
leakage, such as plant material, on abdominocentesis, microorganisms,
and/or squamous cells in the abdominal fluid. The most likely differential
diagnoses for an afebrile animal are indigestion and ketosis. Cows
with indigestion
or ketosis should not be painful and ketotic cows will have ketones
in their urine, as detected by dipstick analysis.1 Overall,
the best differentiator of these diseases is total plasma protein levels.
Total plasma protein should not be increased in a cow with either indigestion
or ketosis and are less severely increased in a cow with a perforating
abomasal ulcer.5
Complications of TRP
Reticular abscesses
are a common complication of TRP. Also, if the foreign body migrates
through the diaphragm and into
the pericardium, it can cause septic pericarditis and subsequent congestive
heart failure. Less common complications include reticular fistulation,
vagal indigestion, and diaphragmatic hernia.1
Treatment
| Note:
Treatment of animals should only be performed by a licensed
veterinarian. Veterinarians should consult the current literature
and current pharmacological formularies before initiating any
treatment protocol. |
Since reticular
foreign bodies often migrate back into the lumen of the reticulum,
conservative treatment can have good results. Conservative
treatment consists of instillation of a magnet to recover or immobilize
the metal foreign body if the foreign body is composed of magnetic
metal. Affected cattle should also receive 3-7 days of systemic antibiotic
therapy (penicillin, ceftiofur,
ampicillin, or tetracycline), stall rest and other supportive therapy
as indicated. Affected cattle should be re-evaluated in 48-72 hours.
If a magnet is already in place or conservative therapy is not successful,
an exploratory laparotomy/rumenotomy is indicated for removal of the
foreign body.1,2
Prevention
Prevention of TRP is preferred to either conservative medical treatment
or surgery. Although one source does not believe magnets are an effective
preventative measure,9 the majority of clinicians agree
that all cattle over one year of age should have a prophylactic magnet
placed in the reticulum.1,2,4 Following oral administration,
most magnets do not enter the reticulum directly, but are first deposited
in the cranial sac of the rumen before entering the reticulum following
ruminal contractions.2 Cattle should be kept away from construction
sites and crop fields should be monitored for metal debris. Also, processed
feed can be passed over magnets to recover any magnetic foreign bodies
prior to being fed to cattle.
References
1. Rebhun WC: Diseases of Dairy Cattle. Philadelphia, Williams and
Wilkins, 1995, pp. 113-116.
2. Ducharme NG, Fubini SL: Surgery of the Ruminant Forestomach Compartments. In: Fubini
SL, Ducharme NG: Farm Animal Surgery. St. Louis, W. B. Saunders Co.,
2004, pp. 186-188.
3. House JK, Smith BP, VanMetre DC, Fecteau G, Craychee T, Neves J:
Ancillary tests for assessment of the ruminant digestive system. Vet
Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 8:203-204, 1992.
4. Ward JL, Ducharme NG: Traumatic reticuloperitonitis in dairy cows.
J Am Vet Med Assoc 204:874-877, 1994.
5. Dubensky RA, White ME: The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive
value of total plasma protein in the diagnosis of traumatic reticuloperitonitis.
Can J Comp Med 47:241-244, 1983.
6. Anderson DE, Cornwell D, Anderson LS, St-Jean G, Desrochers A:
Comparative analyses of peritoneal fluid from calves and adult cattle.
Am J Vet Res 56:973-976, 1995.
7. Latimer KS,
Mahaffey EA, Prasse KW: Duncan & Prasses
Veterinary Laboratory Medicine: Clinical Pathology, 4th ed. Ames, Iowa
State Press, 2003, pp. 68-77, 152-160, 166-167.
8. Hawkins LL: Bovine Digestive Diseases In: Large Animal
Digestive Diseases notes. LAMS 5350 2002, pp. 22-24.
9. Eddy RG: Alimentary Conditions. In: Andrews AH (Ed): Bovine
medicine: disease, and husbandry. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications,
1992, pp. 643-645.
Acknowledgement
"Love is Blind" by
Niina is from the "Holy Cows" gallery on her website Art
by Niina and is used with permission. |