Study
Case Pulmonary
Infiltrates with Eosinophils (PIE)
Justin Boggs, DVM,
Heather L. Tarpley, DVM; Perry J. Bain, DVM, PhD; Kenneth S. Latimer,
DVM, PhD; Bruce E. LeRoy, DVM, PhD
Class of 2004 (Boggs)
and Department of Pathology (Tarpley, Bain, Latimer, LeRoy), College
of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-7388

Signalment
- Canine, Shetland Sheepdog, M/N, 2.5-year-old
Presenting
problems - Coughing unresponsive to therapy (antimicrobials
and bronchodilators) that progressively worsened prior to presentation,
expiratory dyspnea
Physical examination Patient
was bright, alert, and responsive but had obvious dyspnea characterized
by increased abdominal effort with each breath. Lung auscultation
revealed increased bronchovesicular sounds and wheezing. Murmurs
and arrhythmias were not auscultated.
Laboratory Data
-
Complete
blood cell count - |
| |
Day 1 |
Day 2 |
Day 3 |
Units |
Reference Interval |
| Hct |
56.1 |
42.8 |
|
% |
35.0-57.0 |
| RBC |
8.54 H |
6.40 |
|
x 106/µl |
4.95-7.87 |
| |
| WBC |
22.8 H |
20.8 H |
24.7 H |
x
103/µl |
5.1-13.0 |
| Seg |
8.664 (38%) |
13.52 (65%) H |
14.82 (60%) H |
x
103/µl |
2.9-12.0 |
| Band |
0.456 (2%) H |
0.000 (0%) |
0.000 (0%) |
x 103/µl |
0.0-0.45 |
| Lymph |
1.368 (6%) |
3.536 (17%) H |
0.988 (4%) |
x 103/µl |
0.4-2.9 |
| Mono |
2.508 (11%) H |
1.664 (8%) H |
1.482 (6%) H |
x 103/µl |
0.1-1.4 |
| Eos |
9.804 (43%) H |
2.080 (10%) H |
7.410 (30%) H |
x
103/µl |
0.0-1.3 |
| Baso |
0.000
(0%) |
0.000
(0%) |
0.000
(0%) |
x 103/µl |
0.0-0.14 |
Day
1: Initial CBC determined prior to therapy.
Day
2: CBC determined the day after therapy initiated. Treatment
included placement in an oxygen cage, administration of a corticosteroid
(prednisolone sodium succinate), antibiotics (enrofloxacin, clindamycin),
bronchodilators (terbutaline), antihistamine (diphenhydramine),
sedatives,
and nebulization (saline and acetylcysteine).
Day
3: CBC determined after tapering the dosage of the corticosteroid.
|
| Blood Gas Analysis (Day 1) - |
| |
Patient values |
Reference Interval |
Units |
| pH |
7.41 |
7.31-7.42 |
|
| PCO2 |
39.0 |
29-42 |
mmHg |
| PO2 |
61 L |
85-95 |
mmHg |
| HCO3- |
25 H |
17-24 |
mEq/L |
| Base Excess |
1 |
0 ± 2 |
|
| sO2 |
91 L |
100 |
% |
| Other
Results |
| CBC, remainder of biochemical profile, and urinalysis were within
reference intervals. |
| Fecal floatation and Baerman analysis were negative for lungworms
and other parasites. |
| Initial thoracic radiographs: Moderate to severe, diffuse, nodular,
bronchointerstitial pattern. |
Sputum Cytology
- Eosinophilic inflammation and mucus (Fig. 1)
 |
| Figure 1. Mucus, eosinophils, and neutrophils
in the sputum of a dog with dyspnea. |
Problems
1. Leukocytosis,
neutrophilia with a very mild left shift, eosinophilia, and monocytosis.
Day 1: Leukocytosis with eosinophilia and monocytosis.
Eosinophilia is most likely due to respiratory inflammation
since the history, clinical signs, and thoracic radiographs suggest
respiratory
pathology. Though
evidence of intestinal parasites was not observed with fecal floatation,
intestinal parasitism cannot be entirely excluded. Heartworm status
was unknown. Chronic
antigenic stimulation (including allergies) may also be a contributing factor.
Other causes for eosinophilia, such as adrenocortical insufficiency and neoplasia,
are not likely since values on the biochemistry panel were within reference
intervals, and abdominal and thoracic radiographs were not suggestive
of a mass. Monocytosis may occur with acute and
chronic inflammatory disease; this finding is nonspecific.
Day 2: Leukocytosis, mature neutrophilia, lymphocytosis, eosinophilia,
and monocytosis.
The mature
neutrophilia and decrease in eosinophils (though mild eosinophilia persists) is
most likely secondary to steroid therapy.
Corticosteroid
administration decreases neutrophil emigration, decreases neutrophil
adhesion to blood vessel walls, and increases release of neutrophils
from the bone marrow. The circulating neutrophil pool:marginal neutrophil
pool in untreated dogs is approximately 1:1. The resolution of the
left shift also suggests that glucocorticoids have also likely reduced
much
of the inflammatory component of the disease. Corticosteroids increase
margination and sequestration of eosinophils in tissue and decrease
their release from the bone marrow. The mechanism of the lymphocytosis in this
case is unclear. Sequestration of lymphocytes would be the expected
immediate effect of corticosteroid therapy. Other potential causes
of a lymphocytosis
would include a physiologic response (e.g. excitement prior to blood
sampling).
Day
3: Leukocytosis, mature neutrophilia, eosinophilia, and monocytosis.
The mature neutrophilia and a lymphocyte count at the lower end of the reference
interval are most likely secondary to previous use of corticosteroids. The exact
length of treatment is unknown. Neutrophil counts typically return to the reference
interval within 2-3 days of cessation of therapy. Lymphocyte counts may remain
decreased after cessation of therapy if therapy caused lymphocytic lysis. The
return of moderate eosinophilia most likely reflects decreased margination after
cessation of corticosteroid administration rather than increased production.
2. Hypoxemia
with decreased oxygen saturation and mild metabolic alkalosis. Hypoxemia
with decreased oxygen saturation, PCO2 within the reference interval,
and a high alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient in this
patient suggest venous admixture due to alveolar ventilation/perfusion
(VA/Q) mismatch and diffusion impairment. The alveolar-arterial
oxygen gradient is 39.3 mmHg (based on the equation A-a=150-PaCO2(0.8)-PaO2 where (A-a) is the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient). Values >15-20
mmHg indicate parenchymal disease; patients with pure mechanical
hypoventilation have a normal gradient which is <15 mmHg. Diffusion
of oxygen across alveolar-capillary membranes thickened by inflammation
is compromised. The PCO2 level is at the high end of the reference
interval. CO2 easily diffuses out of blood due to its high solubility,
so membrane thickness will have little effect on its movement from
the capillary to the alveolus. The slight elevation of the HCO3- concentration and a base excess >0 indicate the presence of
a very mild metabolic alkalosis in this patient. HCO3- concentration
in blood gas analyses is a calculated (not measured) value determined
by the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation using pH and PCO2 measurements.
BE is also derived from a calculation using standard HCO3-, measured
hemoglobin, PCO2, and body temperature. The reason for a very mild
metabolic alkalosis in this patient is unclear since there is no
known history of vomiting.
Summary -
Pulmonary infiltrates
with eosinophils (PIE), also known as eosinophilic bronchopneumopathy,
is characterized by marked eosinophilic infiltration
of pulmonary parenchyma. This disease represents a marked hypersensitivity
reaction. Potential causes of hypersensitivity include pulmonary
parasites, heartworms, drugs, inhaled allergens, and occasionally bacteria,
fungi,
or neoplasia.
Definitive diagnosis
requires observation of eosinophilic inflammation in cytologic or histologic
preparations of bronchoalveolar
fluid, lung aspiration, or lung biopsies. Marked peripheral eosinophilia
may or may not be present. Thoracic radiographs frequently show
a moderate to severe bronchointerstitial pattern.
Patients respond
well
to corticosteroid
therapy though relapse is common. Potential antigens should be
identified and eliminated, if possible.
In this case of PIE,
presenting signs
included coughing and dyspnea. Peripheral eosinophilia and
hypoxemia were also present. Hypoxemia is attributable mostly to impaired
diffusion and alveolar ventilation/perfusion mismatch. With treatment,
this
dog clinically improved.
Follow-up radiographs
and a transtracheal wash also showed diminished inflammation. Because
clinical
signs
worsened as the dosage of corticosteroids was tapered, the
initial dose was
reinstituted, and the dog was treated with fenbendazole to
eliminate potential lung parasites.
References
1. Clercx C: Is canine
eosinophilic bronchopneumopathy an asthmatic disease? 12th ECVIM-CA
Conference, VIN, 2002.
2. Clercx C, Peeters
D, German AJ, Khelil Y, McEntee K, Vanderplasschen A, Schynts F, Hansen
P, Detilleux J, Day MJ: Eosinophilic bronchopneumopathy
in dogs. J Vet Intern Med 14:282-291, 2000.
3. Latimer KS, Mahaffey
EA, Prasse KW (eds): Duncan & Prasse’s
Veterinary Laboratory Medicine: Clinical Pathology, 4th ed. Ames, Iowa
State Press, 2003, pp. 65-69, 72-74, 270-278.
4. Hawkins EC: Pulmonary
parenchymal disease. In: Ettinger SJ, Feldman EC (eds): Textbook of
Veterinary Internal Medicine, 5th ed. Philadelphia,
WB Saunders Co, 2000, pp. 1071-1072.
5. Corcoran B: Clinical
evaluation of the patient with respiratory disease. In: Ettinger
SJ, Feldman EC (eds): Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine,
5th ed. Philadelphia, WB Saunders Co, 2000, pp. 1038-1039
Acknowledgement
Sheltie Quilt is
from Picture
Quilts by Sharon Malec and is used with permission. |